My husband has been assessed as needing 2 hours a day of care, which is currently managed and funded by the council (not direct payments).
Does anyone know, if we were to change over to direct payments and select a homecare agency that charges more per hour than the council would fund (but would much better meet his needs), would it be ok for him to use less hours than he has been assessed as needing, to reduce the amount of money we would need to top-up by each month to use this better agency? Or would his number of hours of funding be reduced by social services if they notice less hours of care being used?
I am thinking that we could make do with 11 hours of homecare a week, and that I can cover what would have been done during the other 3 hours. It would be great to continue with 14 hours of homecare a week, but we simply can’t finance an additional £500 a month right now, so reducing his paid care by 3 hours a week would take it down to just under £100 extra a month, which is more doable. Thanks.