My newly diagnosed wife has been prescribed Rasagiline (Azilect®)
Can anyone else using this drug explain the effectiveness for them in forstalling the progression of the disease and the suppression of the symptoms. I'd also like to know of any problems experienced with side effects
Hi Davech,
I was given Azilect on diagnosis (march 2011)and told it was a possible neuroprtector (no actual factual evidence researched) yet my PD nurse said that others having taken selegeline (previous old alternative) had faired better than those who hadn't taken it. I can't say that on it's own i got any benefit neither did i get any side effects. My tripping/stubbing my foot episodes have gone so has inner tremor but might be down to taking low dose Sinemet or as i believe, ever changing parkie symptoms! The thing i'm trying to remember is, keep calm, don't panic (easier said than done!) and give yourself time as symptoms change with lifestyle.
Best wishes to you, this forum has been my greatest educator.
Diane
I was given Azilect on diagnosis (march 2011)and told it was a possible neuroprtector (no actual factual evidence researched) yet my PD nurse said that others having taken selegeline (previous old alternative) had faired better than those who hadn't taken it. I can't say that on it's own i got any benefit neither did i get any side effects. My tripping/stubbing my foot episodes have gone so has inner tremor but might be down to taking low dose Sinemet or as i believe, ever changing parkie symptoms! The thing i'm trying to remember is, keep calm, don't panic (easier said than done!) and give yourself time as symptoms change with lifestyle.
Best wishes to you, this forum has been my greatest educator.
Diane
Thanks. what are others experiences please. Does the drug help with slowness/deliberation
rasagaline is the first line of defence and so is not the heavy artilery. its job is to make the most of what dopamine remains naturally. the second line is dopamine agonists which mimic dopamine, the main artilery is levadopa which becomes new dopamine.
it may or may no slowdown progression.if it does its not spectacular.
i found it useful for slowness.
watch out for bahavioural problems if she takes too many DAs.
most people dont have trouble with rasagaline. side effects on the packet.
it may or may no slowdown progression.if it does its not spectacular.
i found it useful for slowness.
watch out for bahavioural problems if she takes too many DAs.
most people dont have trouble with rasagaline. side effects on the packet.
Posted - 14 Oct 2011 10:45
Report this post
http://my.news.yahoo.com/fda-questions-teva-drugs-impact-parkinsons-172613568.html
FDA questions Teva drug's impact on Parkinson's
By MATTHEW PERRONE - AP Health Writer | AP – 15 hours
..WASHINGTON (AP) — Studies of Teva Pharmaceuticals' drug Azilect for Parkinson's disease failed to convince federal scientists that the pill slows the progression of the disease, suggesting the government will reject the company's bid for expanded use of the drug.
Reviewers for the Food and Drug Administration said Thursday that the company's research paints a mixed picture of the drug's effectiveness. Azilect, known generically as rasagiline, is already approved to treat symptoms of Parkinson's, a debilitating disease that slowly breaks down brain cells that control movement.
But Teva has asked the FDA to expand approval so that it can be prescribed to slow the underlying disease. Currently no treatments are approved for that indication.
In briefing documents posted online, the FDA pointed to a number of issues in Teva's studies, including widely disparate results between men and women and varying degrees of symptoms among patients studied.
A 1 milligram dose of the drug appeared to slow patients' disease based on a rating scale that measures symptoms and disease progression, including its effects on mental state, motor skills and daily activities. However, the FDA said a 2 milligram dose of the drug failed to show similar results.
"The failure of the 2 mg group raises serious questions about the interpretation of this study, and, therefore, about whether or not rasagiline has been shown to have disease-modifying effects," FDA reviewers said in documents posted online. "There is no obvious biological explanation for why the 2 mg dose should not be disease-modifying, if the 1 mg dose is."
FDA staff also acknowledged there are no firm criteria for measuring a drug's ability to slow Parkinson's disease.
Teva studied its drug in 1,176 patients with very early Parkinson's disease, who had not been treated previously.
On Monday, the FDA will ask a panel of outside experts whether Teva has provided convincing evidence that its drug impacts the course of Parkinson's disease. The agency is not required to follow the group's advice, though it often does.
About 5 million people worldwide, and 1.5 million in the U.S., have Parkinson's, characterized by increasingly severe tremors and periodically stiff or frozen limbs. Patients gradually lose brain cells that produce dopamine, a chemical key to the circuitry that controls muscle movement. There is no cure, although dopamine-boosting medication and an implanted device called deep brain stimulation can help some symptoms.
The cause of the disease is unknown.
The U.S.-traded shares of Israel-based Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. dipped 1 cent to $39.02 in afternoon trading.
Posted - 18 Oct 2011 15:50
Report this post
Joint Statement by Six Parkinson’s Disease Organizations Regarding Proposed Label Change for Azilect FDA Advisory Committee Meeting October 17, 2011
This statement is prepared on behalf of the American Parkinson Disease Association, The Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson’s Research, the National Parkinson Foundation, the Parkinson’s Action Network, the Parkinson Alliance, and the Parkinson’s Disease Foundation. Together we represent a large segment of the Parkinson’s disease community and, on behalf of that community, we thank the Food and Drug Administration for holding today’s meeting of the Advisory Committee to address the Teva Pharmaceutical application for a labeling of Azilect as a therapy that slows the clinical progression of Parkinson’s disease.
As a community, when it comes to finding new ways of confronting Parkinson’s disease, we are fiercely pro-investment, pro-progress and pro-development.
- We are all dedicated to the development of critically needed new and transformative treatments for people with this devastating disease.
- Each one of us has welcomed the achievement of each milestone in the development of new therapies, from Levodopa in the 1960s, to dopamine agonists and improved surgical approaches in the 1990s, and to MAOB inhibitors, such as Azilect, in the 2000s.
- All of us support the concept of partnering with industry to invest directly in the process of drug development.
As you know, despite the best efforts of our community, for those people who live with Parkinson’s disease (PD) today, there is as yet no disease modifying therapy available –nothing that slows, reverses, or prevents the progression of the disease. And the treatments that we do have merely ease or mask the motor symptoms of PD for a limited period of time.
Parkinson’s disease varies greatly from person to person, and there are vast unmet needs in our community. For these reasons, it is generally our position that any new treatment that offers benefit to some people in some circumstances – even in cases where that benefit is limited -- should be approved and made available as an option for the doctor and the person with Parkinson’s to evaluate. However, given that today’s meeting is about what would be the very first Parkinson’s disease therapy to be approved and labeled for a slowing of progression, we believe a rigorous and dispassionate evaluation is warranted.
While we are encouraged by the evidence presented to date, it appears to our community that the data surrounding Azilect as a therapy that slows clinical progression of Parkinson’s are not yet definitive, and that additional information is required to completely determine the impact of Azilect on clinical disease progression.
Nothing speaks more clearly to this point than the published report of the results of the ADAGIO study, in which the authors state that “the study results must be interpreted with caution.” (Olanow et al, 2009)
It is our understanding that Teva Pharmaceuticals is conducting an open-label follow-up study to examine the ADAGIO cohort further. We are pleased to hear this, and will welcome any additional insight that the study may provide upon its conclusion in 2013.
Furthermore, we believe that the distinction between a treatment that slows the clinical progression of the disease and a true disease-modifying treatment requires elucidation, as the subtle yet significant difference between the two is likely to cause confusion and artificially raise expectations of general practitioners and people with Parkinson’s disease. This is especially true given that Azilect is a therapy that has already been approved by the FDA as a symptomatic treatment for Parkinson’s disease.
Finally, we wish to express our community’s hope that the FDA, in evaluating this application, will use the opportunity to provide needed clarity to the pharmaceutical industry by detailing the requirements that will need to be met to demonstrate success for a disease-modifying therapy in Parkinson’s disease. Such action will remove one aspect of uncertainty in the business decisions that must be made in developing the new treatments that will benefit those people who live with this disease and are most affected by its unrelenting progression.
Thank you for your attention.
Joel Gerstel, President & CEO
American Parkinson Disease Association
Todd Sherer, Ph.D., CEO
The Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson’s Research
Joyce A. Oberdorf, President and CEO
National Parkinson Foundation
Amy Comstock Rick, J.D., CEO
Parkinson’s Action Network
Carol J. Walton, CEO
The Parkinson Alliance
Robin Anthony Elliott, Executive Director
Parkinson’s Disease Foundatio
Report this post
http://my.news.yahoo.com/fda-questions-teva-drugs-impact-parkinsons-172613568.html
FDA questions Teva drug's impact on Parkinson's
By MATTHEW PERRONE - AP Health Writer | AP – 15 hours
..WASHINGTON (AP) — Studies of Teva Pharmaceuticals' drug Azilect for Parkinson's disease failed to convince federal scientists that the pill slows the progression of the disease, suggesting the government will reject the company's bid for expanded use of the drug.
Reviewers for the Food and Drug Administration said Thursday that the company's research paints a mixed picture of the drug's effectiveness. Azilect, known generically as rasagiline, is already approved to treat symptoms of Parkinson's, a debilitating disease that slowly breaks down brain cells that control movement.
But Teva has asked the FDA to expand approval so that it can be prescribed to slow the underlying disease. Currently no treatments are approved for that indication.
In briefing documents posted online, the FDA pointed to a number of issues in Teva's studies, including widely disparate results between men and women and varying degrees of symptoms among patients studied.
A 1 milligram dose of the drug appeared to slow patients' disease based on a rating scale that measures symptoms and disease progression, including its effects on mental state, motor skills and daily activities. However, the FDA said a 2 milligram dose of the drug failed to show similar results.
"The failure of the 2 mg group raises serious questions about the interpretation of this study, and, therefore, about whether or not rasagiline has been shown to have disease-modifying effects," FDA reviewers said in documents posted online. "There is no obvious biological explanation for why the 2 mg dose should not be disease-modifying, if the 1 mg dose is."
FDA staff also acknowledged there are no firm criteria for measuring a drug's ability to slow Parkinson's disease.
Teva studied its drug in 1,176 patients with very early Parkinson's disease, who had not been treated previously.
On Monday, the FDA will ask a panel of outside experts whether Teva has provided convincing evidence that its drug impacts the course of Parkinson's disease. The agency is not required to follow the group's advice, though it often does.
About 5 million people worldwide, and 1.5 million in the U.S., have Parkinson's, characterized by increasingly severe tremors and periodically stiff or frozen limbs. Patients gradually lose brain cells that produce dopamine, a chemical key to the circuitry that controls muscle movement. There is no cure, although dopamine-boosting medication and an implanted device called deep brain stimulation can help some symptoms.
The cause of the disease is unknown.
The U.S.-traded shares of Israel-based Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. dipped 1 cent to $39.02 in afternoon trading.
Posted - 18 Oct 2011 15:50
Report this post
Joint Statement by Six Parkinson’s Disease Organizations Regarding Proposed Label Change for Azilect FDA Advisory Committee Meeting October 17, 2011
This statement is prepared on behalf of the American Parkinson Disease Association, The Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson’s Research, the National Parkinson Foundation, the Parkinson’s Action Network, the Parkinson Alliance, and the Parkinson’s Disease Foundation. Together we represent a large segment of the Parkinson’s disease community and, on behalf of that community, we thank the Food and Drug Administration for holding today’s meeting of the Advisory Committee to address the Teva Pharmaceutical application for a labeling of Azilect as a therapy that slows the clinical progression of Parkinson’s disease.
As a community, when it comes to finding new ways of confronting Parkinson’s disease, we are fiercely pro-investment, pro-progress and pro-development.
- We are all dedicated to the development of critically needed new and transformative treatments for people with this devastating disease.
- Each one of us has welcomed the achievement of each milestone in the development of new therapies, from Levodopa in the 1960s, to dopamine agonists and improved surgical approaches in the 1990s, and to MAOB inhibitors, such as Azilect, in the 2000s.
- All of us support the concept of partnering with industry to invest directly in the process of drug development.
As you know, despite the best efforts of our community, for those people who live with Parkinson’s disease (PD) today, there is as yet no disease modifying therapy available –nothing that slows, reverses, or prevents the progression of the disease. And the treatments that we do have merely ease or mask the motor symptoms of PD for a limited period of time.
Parkinson’s disease varies greatly from person to person, and there are vast unmet needs in our community. For these reasons, it is generally our position that any new treatment that offers benefit to some people in some circumstances – even in cases where that benefit is limited -- should be approved and made available as an option for the doctor and the person with Parkinson’s to evaluate. However, given that today’s meeting is about what would be the very first Parkinson’s disease therapy to be approved and labeled for a slowing of progression, we believe a rigorous and dispassionate evaluation is warranted.
While we are encouraged by the evidence presented to date, it appears to our community that the data surrounding Azilect as a therapy that slows clinical progression of Parkinson’s are not yet definitive, and that additional information is required to completely determine the impact of Azilect on clinical disease progression.
Nothing speaks more clearly to this point than the published report of the results of the ADAGIO study, in which the authors state that “the study results must be interpreted with caution.” (Olanow et al, 2009)
It is our understanding that Teva Pharmaceuticals is conducting an open-label follow-up study to examine the ADAGIO cohort further. We are pleased to hear this, and will welcome any additional insight that the study may provide upon its conclusion in 2013.
Furthermore, we believe that the distinction between a treatment that slows the clinical progression of the disease and a true disease-modifying treatment requires elucidation, as the subtle yet significant difference between the two is likely to cause confusion and artificially raise expectations of general practitioners and people with Parkinson’s disease. This is especially true given that Azilect is a therapy that has already been approved by the FDA as a symptomatic treatment for Parkinson’s disease.
Finally, we wish to express our community’s hope that the FDA, in evaluating this application, will use the opportunity to provide needed clarity to the pharmaceutical industry by detailing the requirements that will need to be met to demonstrate success for a disease-modifying therapy in Parkinson’s disease. Such action will remove one aspect of uncertainty in the business decisions that must be made in developing the new treatments that will benefit those people who live with this disease and are most affected by its unrelenting progression.
Thank you for your attention.
Joel Gerstel, President & CEO
American Parkinson Disease Association
Todd Sherer, Ph.D., CEO
The Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson’s Research
Joyce A. Oberdorf, President and CEO
National Parkinson Foundation
Amy Comstock Rick, J.D., CEO
Parkinson’s Action Network
Carol J. Walton, CEO
The Parkinson Alliance
Robin Anthony Elliott, Executive Director
Parkinson’s Disease Foundatio
I've been taking Azilect for several years, and secretly stopped taking it for a couple of months a while back.
I can honestly say that the drug never made any difference, good or bad, and my PD nurse says that the old theory that it has long term benefits has now more or less been discounted in neurological circles.
.
I can honestly say that the drug never made any difference, good or bad, and my PD nurse says that the old theory that it has long term benefits has now more or less been discounted in neurological circles.
.
I've been dx 2 and half years and was thinking I would probably have to increase my 3 sinemet to four. The addition of Azilect has done what the neuro thought it would, namely smoothed things out so that I feel normal all the time instead of not quite myself. Its a very subtle effect and other people might not find it so helpful. I've seen it recommended for people in the early stages and again for those in the later stages. As mentioned above it is difficult to untangle symptomatic benefits from decrease in the rate of the basic disease in the brain but for the daily life of the patient its all the same what it does as long as it does it.
I've had another think about this and realised that what was really bothering me before I added the Azilect was my fine coordination which was beginning to deteriorate and this has certainly clearly improved back to normal.
i'm on segeline instead of rasagiline and personally i find it much more effective though that is a subjective judgement. its also a lot cheaper. i don't know why more people arent given it instead. if you are given it i wouldnt assume you are getting a second-rate option.
Thanks all